Quote:

 

I am constantly amazed that there are people who try to deny the law of non-contradiction, which is the most basic principle of rational thought. What is the law of non-contradiction? There are at least three ways to state it:
A thing cannot both be A and not-A at the same time and in the same sense.
A thing cannot both exist and not exist at the same time and in the same sense.
A statement cannot both be true and not true at the same time and in the same sense.
It is impossible to deny this law without invoking it in your denial, yet time and again I have heard people try do just that!
Why would I spend a blog post writing about this? Because a person who thinks that this law is not true will become a thoroughly confused individual whose thought life is a complete mess, full of contradictions and inconsistencies. I have met a few of these people, and they both sadden and scare me.
- See more at: http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org/2011/12/28/what-is-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#sthash.LMtBLn4h.dpuf

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 05:37 PM

Yes you're running in circles by going back and only choosing the feats that support your side. There are also feats that don't support your side. There's no point at all trying to convince people that they should be able to wipe out a city.

Yes you're right they should be able to destroy a city with a blast. It's pointless to keep trying to convince me or anyone else since we can read the text and agree with your evidence. But at the same time other people are also right when they say don't do X busters since they also bring multiple evidences showing that hey don't. That shows that we're either both right or both wrong.

Here read this

Quote:

 

I am constantly amazed that there are people who try to deny the law of non-contradiction, which is the most basic principle of rational thought. What is the law of non-contradiction? There are at least three ways to state it:
A thing cannot both be A and not-A at the same time and in the same sense.
A thing cannot both exist and not exist at the same time and in the same sense.
A statement cannot both be true and not true at the same time and in the same sense.
It is impossible to deny this law without invoking it in your denial, yet time and again I have heard people try do just that!
Why would I spend a blog post writing about this? Because a person who thinks that this law is not true will become a thoroughly confused individual whose thought life is a complete mess, full of contradictions and inconsistencies. I have met a few of these people, and they both sadden and scare me.
- See more at: http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org/2011/12/28/what-is-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#sthash.LMtBLn4h.dpuf

In essence; If I argued Goku can't level a city I'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can't. If you argued he can then you'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can. If there are inconsistencies and contradictions you don't pick the ones that favor your argument and then say please don't look at the others.

supersaqer

Aug 25 2014, 07:39 PM

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 05:37 PM

Yes you're running in circles by going back and only choosing the feats that support your side. There are also feats that don't support your side. There's no point at all trying to convince people that they should be able to wipe out a city.

Yes you're right they should be able to destroy a city with a blast. It's pointless to keep trying to convince me or anyone else since we can read the text and agree with your evidence. But at the same time other people are also right when they say don't do X busters since they also bring multiple evidences showing that hey don't. That shows that we're either both right or both wrong.

Here read this

Quote:

 

I am constantly amazed that there are people who try to deny the law of non-contradiction, which is the most basic principle of rational thought. What is the law of non-contradiction? There are at least three ways to state it:
A thing cannot both be A and not-A at the same time and in the same sense.
A thing cannot both exist and not exist at the same time and in the same sense.
A statement cannot both be true and not true at the same time and in the same sense.
It is impossible to deny this law without invoking it in your denial, yet time and again I have heard people try do just that!
Why would I spend a blog post writing about this? Because a person who thinks that this law is not true will become a thoroughly confused individual whose thought life is a complete mess, full of contradictions and inconsistencies. I have met a few of these people, and they both sadden and scare me.
- See more at: http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org/2011/12/28/what-is-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#sthash.LMtBLn4h.dpuf

In essence; If I argued Goku can't level a city I'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can't. If you argued he can then you'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can. If there are inconsistencies and contradictions you don't pick the ones that favor your argument and then say please don't look at the others.

We will end in an endless loop. For the sake of this thread, let us use the feats that were more consistent, which are the ones I used, or as I said, we'll end up in a huge loop.

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 07:59 PM

supersaqer

Aug 25 2014, 07:39 PM

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 05:37 PM

Yes you're running in circles by going back and only choosing the feats that support your side. There are also feats that don't support your side. There's no point at all trying to convince people that they should be able to wipe out a city.

Yes you're right they should be able to destroy a city with a blast. It's pointless to keep trying to convince me or anyone else since we can read the text and agree with your evidence. But at the same time other people are also right when they say don't do X busters since they also bring multiple evidences showing that hey don't. That shows that we're either both right or both wrong.

Here read this

Quote:

 

I am constantly amazed that there are people who try to deny the law of non-contradiction, which is the most basic principle of rational thought. What is the law of non-contradiction? There are at least three ways to state it:
A thing cannot both be A and not-A at the same time and in the same sense.
A thing cannot both exist and not exist at the same time and in the same sense.
A statement cannot both be true and not true at the same time and in the same sense.
It is impossible to deny this law without invoking it in your denial, yet time and again I have heard people try do just that!
Why would I spend a blog post writing about this? Because a person who thinks that this law is not true will become a thoroughly confused individual whose thought life is a complete mess, full of contradictions and inconsistencies. I have met a few of these people, and they both sadden and scare me.
- See more at: http://www.toughquestionsanswered.org/2011/12/28/what-is-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#sthash.LMtBLn4h.dpuf

In essence; If I argued Goku can't level a city I'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can't. If you argued he can then you'd be wrong since there's solid evidence he can. If there are inconsistencies and contradictions you don't pick the ones that favor your argument and then say please don't look at the others.

We will end in an endless loop. For the sake of this thread, let us use the feats that were more consistent, which are the ones I used, or as I said, we'll end up in a huge loop.

Yes because you keep on insisting on using feats that support your side. It keeps going in a loop since you keep throwing up responses hoping something sticks without even understanding what you're responding to.

Let me try to explain again (lol): Inconsistent isn't a weapon you use to erase feats. When you say a feat is inconsistent you're giving an inconsistent blanket overall of them, INCLUDING Piccolo destroying a city. It isn't just the one you're supporting.

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 08:35 PM

Looks like my Izanami has been effective. You'll never leave!

random relevant content

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-noncontradiction/

Itachi

Aug 25 2014, 09:08 PM

That's true. You don't have to agree with me even though we've reached a standstill. I was mainly looking at the possibility of teaching some random tidbits. If I see no hope I don't bother. I saw some hope so I went on for so pretty long.

Also what's up with the judging in the tournament. You guys finished like weeks ago.